Prosecutors say Diddy should remain imprisoned for "pattern of violence": BAIL DENIED FOR THE THIRD TIME🛑
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' judicial soap opera won another tense chapter on Wednesday (22). For the third time, a judge denied the star's bail request, who has been detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn since his arrest on September 16. Manipulation Attempts and Witnesses Under Pressure According to prosecutors, Diddy tried to influence witnesses and used resources from other prisoners to contact third parties, trying to shape the opinion of a future jury - all from inside the jail. This was one of the reasons that led federal judge Arun Subramanian to decide that "no condition or combination of conditions can guarantee the safety of the community".
Public Visionary
Accusations and Controversial Comparisons The 55-year-old rapper is responsible for heavy charges, including sex trafficking, conspiracy to extortion and transportation for prostitution purposes. The case revolves mainly around the allegations of his former partner Casandra "Cassie" Ventura, and, if convicted, he can get from 15 years to life imprisonment. Meanwhile, Diddy's defense tries to argue that he is being treated unfairly. They pointed out the case of Mike Jeffries, former CEO of Abercrombie & Fitch, who also faces sex trafficking charges, but was released on bail of US$ 10 million. However, prosecutors claim that, unlike Jeffries, Diddy would have operated a "criminal network based on violence, use of firearms and physical, emotional and sexual abuse".
Public Visionary
Millionaire Bail Rejected Even with a robust proposal of $50 million, including his mansion in Miami, children's passports and 24-hour monitoring, the bail request was rejected. The decision was a hard blow to his family, who crowded the court in search of his release before the Thanksgiving holiday. Now, Diddy awaits the trial, scheduled for May 2025, while appealing again to try his freedom. 💬 What do you think of this case? Is Diddy being treated fairly or does the seriousness of the accusations justify the decision? Comment here! 🐝
